Legal Opinion
Snoke v. M & M DODGE, INC.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided June 28, 1989No. 88-313PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
546 So.2d 936 (1989)
Sarah B. SNOKE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
M & M DODGE, INC. and Chrysler Corporation, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 88-313.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.
June 28, 1989.
Pharis & Pharis, Fred Pharis, Alexandria, for plaintiff-appellant.
Harld Van Dyke, Gold, Weems, Robert Nida, Alexandria, for defendants-appellees.
Before GUIDRY, FORET and DOUCET, JJ.
DOUCET, Judge.
This is a redhibition suit. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting a reduction in price but denying recision of the sale.
FACTS
Plaintiff purchased a new 1986 Plymouth Turismo automobile…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Arceneaux v. DomingueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- Canter v. Koehring CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
- Rey v. CucciaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
- Philippe v. Browning Arms Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
- LaFleur v. John Deere Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Goodman v. RobertsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
- Landry v. Forest River, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
- Nassif v. Sunrise Homes, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
- Morgan v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
- Peggy Landry and Dale Landry v. Forest River, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2007