Legal Opinion

McInnis v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 18, 1945No. 11111PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree in admiralty dismissing a libel by a seaman under the Suits in Admiralty Act, alleging him to have been employed on the Steamship Hobart Baker on a voyage for the War Shipping Administration from Wilmington, South Carolina, to Wellington, New Zea-land, against the United States, (a) for injuries received in Wellington from falling from the Hobart Baker’s allegedly insecure gangway and (b) for maintenance and cure.

In the absence of war-time legislation, the libel showed a right of recovery under 46 U.S.C. § 742 and § 741 of the Suits in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Standard Oil Co. of NJSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Cortes v. Baltimore Insular Line, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Jamison v. EncarnacionSupreme Court of the United States · 1930

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. LoyolaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
  2. Rodinciuc v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
  3. Copper S. S. Co. v. State of MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
  4. Handley v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
  5. Kakara v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API