Legal Opinion

Ross v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 11, 1908No. 4034PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSOH, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted for violating the local option law. •

Many of the questions in this case have been decided adversely to appellant during this term of the court, and, therefore, will not be revised.

The witnesses Leonard and Pryor were introduced by the appellant. On their cross-examination, the State was permitted to prove by them that they each kept some whisky in a room or place at Bowie in Montague County, which the State’s counsel termed in his question, a clubroom, prior to the -time said room was closed under a search warrant and the contents thereof…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gilmore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
  2. Keaton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
  3. Holmes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
  4. Goble v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1901
  5. Drye v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wise v. City of AbileneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API