Legal Opinion
Mayo v. Mayo
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided December 7, 2000No. 20000032Published
1Opinion of the Court
619 N.W.2d 631 (2000)
2000 ND 204
Pamela MAYO, now known as Pamela Banjac, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
William M. MAYO, Defendant and Appellee.
No. 20000032.
Supreme Court of North Dakota.
December 7, 2000.
Rehearing Denied January 30, 2001.
Mark A. Meyer of Meyer Law Firm, Wahpeton, ND, for plaintiff and appellant.
Robert J. Schultz of Conmy, Feste, Hubbard, Corwin & Brust, Ltd., Fargo, ND, for defendant and appellee. Appearance by Scott M. Knudsvig, third-year law student.
NEUMANN, Justice.
[¶ 1] Pamela Mayo, now known as Pamela Banjac, appeals from a trial court amended judgment changing custody of…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Quill Corp. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. HeitkampSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Blotske v. LeidholmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Ludwig v. BurchillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Holtz v. HoltzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- N.C.C. v. C.S.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.