Joseph v. New York City Railway Co.
New York Supreme Court
Motion to resettle order setting aside verdict and granting new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtGoff, J.
The circumstance which made it necessary to set aside this verdict was the injustice done to the defendant John Kissel & Son in imposing upon it damages unwarranted by any evidence in the case. Since both defendants were sued as joint tort feasors, and a general verdict was returned against the two, it was impossible to set aside the verdict as to one and not as to the other. In the granting of such a motion great latitude of discretion is allowed the trial court in this department (Robinson v. Interurban St. R. Co., 113 App. Div. 46) ; and as a general practice the granting of costs is not…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Anderson v. Rome, Watertown & Ogdensburgh RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Robinson v. Interurban Street Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- Cohen v. KrulewitchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- Duffy v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1907