Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Tax Appeals Tribunal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 13, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mikoll, J. P.

Petitioner owns and operates Globe Wholesale Company, a wholesale dealer and distributor of cigarettes (see, Tax Law § 470 [8]; 20 NYCRR 330.2 [h] [1]) and other products to retailers or subagents in New York. As a tax agent for New York City and the State, petitioner purchases and affixes stamps to packages of cigarettes in his inventory (see, Tax Law § 470 [11]; 20 NYCRR 330.2 [g] [1]), which stamps evidence payment of the cigarette tax (see, 20 NYCRR 330.2 [b]). The retailers or subagents pay the tax to petitioner upon their purchase of the cigarettes from him and, in turn,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. 1230 Park Associates v. Commissioner of Taxation & FinanceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. F & W Oldsmobile, Inc. v. Tax CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Lincoln First Commercial Corp. v. New York State Tax CommissionNew York Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Mandel Tobacco Co. v. State Tax CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. Commissioner of Taxation & FinanceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. City Line Candy & Tobacco Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2013
  3. City Line Candy & Tobacco Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API