Legal Opinion

(SS) Harvey v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. California

Decided November 7, 2022No. 1:20-cv-00077Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RYAN CLAYTON HARVEY, Case No. 1:20-cv-00077-SAB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING COUNSEL’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ATTORNEY 13 v. FEES PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) 14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL (ECF No. 25) SECURITY, 15 Defendant. 16 17 I. 18 INTRODUCTION 19 Matthew F. Holmberg of the Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, Inc., CPC 20 (“Counsel”), attorney for Ryan Clayton Harvey (“Plaintiff”), filed the instant motion for attorney 21 fees on August 22, 2022. (Mot. Att’y Fees (“Mot.”), ECF No. 25.) Counsel requests fees…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Crawford v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Hearn v. BarnhartDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2003
  4. James v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API