Legal Opinion

Martindale v. Bridgforth

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 17, 1924No. 6 Div. 950PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

This is a will contest.

The fifth ground of contest sets forth that the proponent is not the person described in the will as beneficiary or executrix. The bequest is to. “my half-sister Alice Bridgforth.” It is not questioned that Alice Bridgforth, the proponent, is the same person named in the will, but it is claimed she was not the “half-sister” of the testator; that being so described in the will evidences an intention to make the bequest to her because of the relation stated; that the supposed kinship was the motive of the gift; that therefore the bequest must fail because she does not…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Best Park & Amusement Co. v. RollinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  2. Wenning v. TeepleIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Blakey's Heirs v. Blakey'sSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
  4. Estate of CarsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Moore v. HeinekeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ray v. HuettSupreme Court of Alabama · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API