Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bell

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 25, 1989No. 2438PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAMILIA, Judge:

Appellant was tried by a jury and found guilty on February 26, 1987 of robbery, burglary, aggravated assault, criminal conspiracy and possessing an instrument of crime. He was sentenced to three consecutive terms of imprisonment totalling 15 to 50 years (robbery, 5-20 years; burglary, 5-20 years; aggravated assault, 5-10 years) and two concurrent terms of imprisonment totalling 5V2 to 15 years (conspiracy, 3-10 years; possessing instrument of crime, 2V2 to 5 years). Seven issues are raised on appeal: 1) whether the court erred in failing to dismiss the case under Rule 1100; 2)…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MayfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. GoldhammerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Commonwealth v. FordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. WeaklandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MoyeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Commonwealth v. EnnisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Commonwealth v. MilliganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Commonwealth v. BlassingaleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Commonwealth v. VergotzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API