Legal Opinion
Brown v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 21, 1988No. 88-641PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
535 So.2d 671 (1988)
Charlie BROWN, Jr., Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 88-641.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
December 21, 1988.
Neal L. Betancourt of Rotchford & Betancourt, P.A., Jacksonville, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Bradford L. Thomas, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.
SMITH, Chief Judge.
On appeal of his sentence, Brown argues that the reasons given by the trial court for exceeding the guidelines were invalid. We believe that at least one of the reasons given is a valid basis for departure, and therefore we affirm.
Appellant…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hendrix v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Fuller v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Santana v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Lee v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Hendsbee v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
- Campbell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Busby v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990