Legal Opinion

People v. Harrell

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 22, 1989No. A023011PublishedCited by 25 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WHITE, P. J.

Defendant and appellant Hulen Timothy Harrell appeals from the judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda county entered after a jury found him guilty of assault with intent to commit rape. (Pen. Code, § 220.) Appellant, who proceeded in propria persona at trial, contends on appeal that the trial court erred in allowing the prosecution to impeach him with his prior burglary convictions, in improperly instructing the jury, and in failing to issue adequate “Faretta warnings,” (Faretta v. California (1976) 422 U.S. 806 [45 L.Ed.2d 562, 95 S.Ct. 2525]) that the evidence was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. People v. GuerreroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. People v. FritzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. People v. AlfaroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. People v. CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. People v. TuggleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. People v. AbarcaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API