Legal Opinion

Continental Insurance Co. v. Excel Insurance Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1976PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARBISON, Justice.

This is an action in which proration of alleged overlapping insurance coverage was sought by appellee Excel Insurance Compa*953ny. The trial court allowed recovery, and this appeal ensued.

The facts of the case were stipulated in the trial court, and no testimony was offered by either party, other than that contained in the stipulation and in the exhibits thereto.

According to the documents in the record, Herndon Motor Lines and/or Crandel B. Herndon operated as a common carrier in interstate commerce. That company held by a permanent, or long-term, lease a certain tractor…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Transamerica Insurance Co. v. ParrottCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1975
  3. Benson v. Travelers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  4. Continental Insurance v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaTennessee Supreme Court · 1970
  5. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co. v. TaylorTennessee Supreme Court · 1974

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1996
  2. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2016
  3. Landmark American Insurance Company v. Heco Realty, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2021
  4. Sentry Select Insurance Company v. Tennessee Farmer's Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API