Legal Opinion

White v. Scott

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1881PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from Allen Distriot Court. Action brought by Scott and others against White, for the recovery of money. At the March Term, 1881, the district court affirmed the judgment of the justice of the peace for the plaintiffs, and against the defendant White, who brings the case here. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Brewer, J.:

On the 24th of January, 1881, defendants in error filed their bill of particulars before one John A. Christy, a justice of the peace, claiming judgment against the plaintiff in error in the sum of $100, for money claimed to be due them by virtue of a written contract. Trial was had before the justice without a jury, and judgment rendered in favor of the defendants in error for the amount claimed. A bill of exceptions was prepared and the case taken on error to the district court, which affirmed the judgment of the justice. From this ruling…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bagley v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  2. Crater v. . BiningerNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Lane v. TylerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1861
  4. Truitt v. BairdSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
  5. Ellison v. ChapmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1844

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Choctaw, O. G. R. Co. v. BurgessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Stiles, Treasurer v. City of GuthrieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  3. Buster v. FletcherIdaho Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Cotner College v. HylandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  5. Galbreath Gas Co. v. Lindsey Et Ux.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API