Legal Opinion

Vordenbaumen v. Bartlett

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 1, 1901No. 13,834PublishedCited by 6 opinions

IN RE Vordenbaumen & Eastman, Applying for Gertiorari, or Writ of Review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, State of Louisiana.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Breaux, J. On application for a rehearing by Breaux, J.

*753Breaux, J. This action was brought by plaintiffs on an attested account.

' Plaintiffs, asked for judgment for the amount and recognition of a privilege for its payment.

The contractor, Bartlett, filed a general denial. The owner, the Neith lodge of Shreveport, admitted having entered into a contract with this contractor for the erection of a building, under the provisions of Act 180 of 1894, and averred that one of the plaintiffs, Vordenbaumen, was one of the sureties on Bartlett’s bond, which had…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Neith Lodge, No. 21, I. O. O. F. v. VordenbaumenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
  2. In re Great Southern Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
  3. Robertshaw Controls Company v. Pre-Engineered Products, Co., Inc., Ball-Co Contractors, Inc. And Algernon-Blair, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  4. Daniel v. VasquezLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1912
  5. French Market Homestead Ass'n v. DexheimerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API