State v. Corsiglia
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CLEMENS, Commissioner.
On this appeal we hold that the trial court erred in admitting evidence of a “Breathalyzer” test showing the percentage of alcohol in the defendant’s blood.
The defendant was convicted of driving while intoxicated and fined $100. He appeals, challenging the admission of evidence of the result of a Breathalyzer test. Defendant contends the test revealed only a percentage of alcohol in blood computed by volume and failed to show a percentage of alcohol in blood computed by weight as required by § 564.442, V.A.M.S.
That section declares that when a person is charged with…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cited by15 opinions
- State v. HansenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
- Commonwealth v. BrooksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- State v. ChesterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
- State v. SinclairMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
- State v. McKinneyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.