State v. Nano
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLee, J.
This is an appeal from a conviction of theft in the first degree. Defendant assigns, inter alia, as error, the trial court’s overruling of defendant’s objection to certain testimony as contravening the “best evidence rule” (ORS 41.640) infra. We agree.
The essential facts are: At 9:30 a.m. on March 23, 1974, a shipping clerk delivered a box to the calculator department of a Salem store. The evidence suggested but was not conclusive that the box contained calculators. At 10:30 a.m. the same day, the store manager noticed there were no clerks in the calculator department. He looked behind the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hammons v. SCHRUNKOregon Supreme Court · 1956
- Atckison v. TriplettOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. LenhardtOregon Supreme Court · 1936
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. NanoOregon Supreme Court · 1975