Legal Opinion

Henwood v. Cheeseman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 20, 1817PublishedCited by 8 opinions

In Error. ERROR to the Court of Common Pipas of Philadelphia. county.

1Opinion of the Court

Tilghman C. J.

Cheeseman, the plaintiff below, brought an action óf assumpsit against Heft-wood, for the use and occupation of the plaintiff’s land, lying in the state of New Jersey. Several exceptions were taken by the defendant to the charge of the Court, and have been assigned as errors, here. The second and fourth exceptions are not to be regarded. They are no more than complaints, that in summing up the evidence, the Court were inaccurate. With mistakes of that kind, if mistakes there were, this Court has nothing to do. In no point of View can they be considered as errors of law ; and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. StewartNew York Supreme Court · 1810
  2. Corp. of New York v. DawsonNew York Supreme Court · 1801

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Croswell v. CraneNew York Supreme Court · 1849
  2. In Re Marriage of KowalewskiWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. In re the Marriage of KowalewskiWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Ackerman v. LymanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Croswell v. CraneNew York Supreme Court · 1849

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API