Gray v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Smith, Judge.
After a jury trial the appellant was found guilty on twelve separate counts involving illegal possession of drugs. We find merit in his contention that he was not afforded a hearing on his motion to suppress certain evidence, and for that reason the judgment must be reversed and a new trial granted.
1. During the course of this prosecution, the appellant had been represented by three attorneys. The first attorney filed a motion to suppress which the state contends was abandoned. Immediately prior to trial, the second attorney filed a renewed motion, alleging the original grounds…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Hatcher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Sapp v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Perryman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Peabody v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- State v. SheadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.