Legal Opinion

McLaughlin v. Central Surety & Insurance

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 14, 1933PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brown, S. C. C.

The plaintiff moves to strike the defendant’s answer on the ground that it is sham in part and frivolous in the remainder. The pleadings disclose that on the 15th day of March, 1932, the plaintiff sustained personal injuries from the negligent operation of an automobile by Bart Petella. The plaintiff brought suit for damages in a District Court and recovered a judgment against Petella on the 27th day of June, 1932. Petella at the time he is alleged to have injured the plaintiff was insured against the loss by the defendant insurance company. An effort was made to collect the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Farm Bureau Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. v. HammerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
  2. Hoosier Cas. Co. of Indianapolis, Ind. v. FoxDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1952
  3. Perkins v. PerkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
  4. McCarthy v. Insurance Company of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  5. Brodsky v. Motorists Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API