Legal Opinion

Crater v. County of Somerset

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 9, 1939Published

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Joseph L., S. C. C.

This comes on a motion to strike the answers and various defenses filed in each of the above cases, upon the ground that they are in part sham, in part insufficient in law, and in part frivolous, impertinent and scandalous. All three cases involve the same principles and will be discussed jointly.

The plaintiffs, Messrs. Crater, Sutphen and Yail, are clerk, surrogate and sheriff, respectively, of the county of Somerset, *134having been elected to their offices on November 2d, 1937, and having qualified for office on November of that year. They sue for balances of salaries…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Galpin v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Smith v. National Commercial Title & Mortgage Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
  3. Vander Burgh v. County of BergenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
  4. Delmar v. County of BergenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
  5. State ex rel. Stahl v. Inhabitants of TrentonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1892

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API