Legal Opinion

McFarland v. . McDowell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 5, 1813Published

1Opinion of the Court

It is admitted that the complainant has set forth and charged such facts in his bill as entitle him to the interference and aid of a court of equity against defendant's judgment at law; that those facts and allegations had been admitted, or not denied, by the answer of the defendant. It is also true that the defendant, in his answer, has not directly and positively denied the truth of the plaintiff's allegations. On this ground it is contended that the complainant, notwithstanding the defendant's answer, is still entitled to such aid and protection.

Although the defendant has not positively…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nichols v. Newsom.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1813
  2. Williams v. . BransonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1810
  3. Thigpen v. . BalfourSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1813
  4. Radcliff v. Bartholomew, Alpress & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1845
  5. Stuart v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1813

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API