Legal Opinion

Hale v. Hale

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 5, 1942No. Civ. 6619PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOTTKY, J. pro tem.

Appellant and respondent were divorced in 1927, and in such proceeding the custody of Nathan G. Hale, Jr., then four years old, was awarded to appellant mother, and respondent father was ordered to pay to appellant the sum of $150 per month for the support, maintenance and education of said minor son. In 1932, by consent of both parties, an order was made reducing the amount of said monthly payment to $125. Thereafter, in 1940, when said son was eighteen years old, appellant made application to the court for an increase of said monthly payment to $175, and this appeal is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilder v. WilderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Lent v. HC Morris Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. Sharpe v. SharpeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Berry v. ChaplinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. Pass v. PassMississippi Supreme Court · 1960
  3. De La Luz Tovar Cozzi v. CozziCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Frizzell v. FrizzellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Wong v. Wong Hing YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API