Renard v. Bennett
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Cloud district court; William T. Dillon, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, C. J.:
This was an action by Edward Bennett and Nettie Seyster, children of Orrin E. Bennett, to recover an- undivided! one-half interest in a tract of land lying near the city of Concordia, and they asked for partition as well as rents and profits. *849The tract was formerly owned by D. W. Williams, who conveyed an undivided one-half interest to Orrin E. Bennett, and together they operated a brewery on the land until 1881, when the prohibitory law went into effect. About that .time Williams removed to Missouri, while Bennett remained at Concordia…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hitz v. AhlgrenIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
- Modern Woodmen of America v. GerdomSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
- Latham v. TombsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903
- Francis v. FrancisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Iberia Cypress Co. v. ThorgesonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Marquet v. Aetna Life Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1913
- McLaughlin v. Sovereign CampNebraska Supreme Court · 1914
- Modern Woodmen of America v. GhromleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Caldwell v. Modern WoodmenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- Eklund v. Supreme Council of Royal ArcanumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.