Legal Opinion

People v. Lancaster

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided November 8, 1979No. 78-066PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SILVERSTEIN, Judge.

Defendant, Ronald Lancaster, appeals his jury conviction of sexual assault without force on a child. Defendant asserts as error the admission into evidence of the victim’s statement to her mother as part of the res gestae, and the determination that the victim’s seven-year-old brother was competent to testify. We affirm.

The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict, People v. McCollum, 38 Colo.App. 283, 555 P.2d 184 (1976), discloses that on the evening of September 3, 1977, defendant stopped by the home of the victim’s mother and asked for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Archina v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  2. Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  3. State v. HutchisonOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. People v. ButlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Harris v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lancaster v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  2. People v. VialpandoColorado Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API