Legal Opinion

In Re Cowden

California Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1903No. Crim. No. 1027PublishedCited by 15 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.

The petitioner was imprisoned and confined in the county jail of the city and county of San Francisco, on a commitment of the superior court of said city and county, entered on the eighth day of May, 1903, as for contempt of court. He petitions this court to be released and discharged from such imprisonment, on the ground that such imprisonment is illegal, and that said order of commitment was without the jurisdiction of the court making it, and was void.

It appears from the petition that on the first day of December, 1902, Nellie E. Cowden obtained a judgment and decree of divorce from the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Ex parte SilviaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Van Hoosear v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. State Ex Rel. Murphy v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Bakeman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  4. People v. ForesterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  5. Martin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API