Legal Opinion

Halsey v. Watson

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1803PublishedCited by 2 opinions

This was a motion for a new trial, on an affidavit of a discovery of new and material evidence. The points and substance are so fully stated in the decision of the court f-hat it is unnecessary to do more than give the judgment.

1Per curiam

This is a motion for a new trial, and comes before us on the ground of a discovery of material testimony since the trial of the cause. To see this, and judge whether it be material or not, it will be necessary to state the former testimony and nature of the suit.

It is assumpsit by Halsey, the plaintiff, against James and Samuel Watson, the defendants, as owners of the ship Chesapeake, founded on a neglect in not taking on board some tobacco, according to contract.

The witness, Heyer, who appears to have acted as agent for the plaintiff, states what the contract was, and the time * at which the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Douglass v. TouseyNew York Supreme Court · 1829
  2. Steinbach v. Columbian InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1804
  3. Smith v. HicksNew York Supreme Court · 1830

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. CarrSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1850
  2. Crafts v. Union Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1858

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API