Legal Opinion

O'Connor v. Simpson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1905No. 5386PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Morris, J., entered April 20, 1904, dismissing an action upon contract, at the close of plaintiff’s testimony, after a trial before the court, a jury being waived.

1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.

This action was commenced by appellant, Albert O’Connor, against respondent, Sol. G. Simpson, to recover a sum alleged to be due for labor performed in doing certain assessment work, on certain mining claims on Tuttle Creek, in the District of Alaska, within the Arctic Circle, which claims were the property of the Cutter Bear Mining Company, a corporation. It is claimed by appellant that, at a meeting of the stockholders of said company, held in the office of respondent, in Seattle, Washington, it *626appeared that said company did not have available funds with which to prosecute said assessment…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. O'Connor v. ForceWashington Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API