Legal Opinion
Miller v. Miller Knitting Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 15, 1898PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Action to foreclose a mortgage.
1Opinion of the CourtFursman, J.
In 1882 Samuel D. Miller was carrying on the knitting business at or near Mellenville, Columbia county, R. Y., and in Rovember of that year executed and delivered to the plaintiff a mortgage upon his real estate to secure the plaintiff against loss by reas'om of his indorsement of the paper of Samuel “ not exceeding $20,000 in the aggregate.” Afterwards Samuel conveyed an interest in the mortgaged premises to his two sons, William O. Miller and Sanford S. Miller, and entered into copartnership with them in the same business under the firm name and style of Samuel D. Miller & Sons. The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Scott v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Chace v. HinmanNew York Supreme Court · 1832
- Paulding v. . the Chrome Steel CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Gilbert v. . WimanNew York Court of Appeals · 1848
- National Bank of Newburgh v. . BiglerNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brandrup v. Empire State Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Mathews v. HardtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Mathews v. HardtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903