Legal Opinion
Ackermann v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided December 29, 1949No. 12610_1PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUSSELL, Circuit Judge.
The facts of this case do not bring it' within the decision of Klapprott v. United States, 335 U.S. 601, 69 S.Ct. 384, and the trial Court did not hold that the grounds stated in the motion were not sufficient to invoke the authority of the Court. As to this, the order of the Court recites that the Court, having considered the motion, "is of the opinion that there is no merit to said motion and that the same should be denied.”
The fundamental difference between the Klapprott case and the present is that the rulings there made are predicated upon a state of facts entirely…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Sunal v. LargeSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Sunal v. LargeSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Baumgartner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- John Simmons Co. v. Grier Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Benjamin Polycarpo Soley v. The Star & Herald Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Elizabeth Annat v. Daniel B. Beard and Warren J. Hamilton, Elizabeth Annat v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- United States v. MarcelloDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1968
- In Re NailUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.