Brown v. Bolt
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Muskegon; Russell, J. Trover by Frank E. Brown and John Sehler against Thomas J. G. Bolt. From a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
This action is in trover,' brought in justice’s court, for the conversion of one-half of the crop of mint grown on the farm of defendant in the season of 1896 by one Sherman Dow, under contract with defendant, by which it is claimed by plaintiffs that Dow was to become the owner of one-half of said crop. The interest of plaintiffs was under a chattel mortgage given by Dow to them. The cause was appealed to the circuit court, there tried before a jury, and verdict directed in favor of defendant. Plaintiffs bring error.
It appears that this contract was made in the spring of 1895, and was to…
2Cited by3 opinions
- McDavid v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1906
- Hamilton Nat. Bank v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Winchester Packing Co. v. MoyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920