Legal Opinion

Pruett v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1973PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McCANLESS, Justice.

The defendant, Charles Edward Pruett, was convicted of burglary in a state court but alleges in a post-conviction petition that an identical charge based on the same transaction had already been heard and dismissed in the city court. The defense of double jeopardy was not argued, however, because the rule in Waller v. Florida, 397 U.S. 387, 90 S.Ct. 1184, 25 L.Ed.2d 435 [1970], was not applicable at that time. That rule has since been given retroactive effect, raising a question whether the defendant’s state court conviction constituted double jeopardy. The question…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Waller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Robinson v. NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Pruitt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1970
  4. Arthur v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Stokely v. Southern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Swanson v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. JeffersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State v. BranamTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Rickman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
  5. Forrest v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API