Legal Opinion

Anderson v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1908PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action for damages alleged to have been caused by the',, elevation of railroad tracks in front of plaintiff’s premises.

1Opinion of the CourtTruax, J.

In January, 1896, the plaintiffs conveyed to the defendant Wheeler certain property on Park avenue, in this city, and at the same time entered into a separate agreement, which recites that the cause of action which the plaintiffs had against the Hew York Central and Hudson ¡River ¡Railroad Company and the Hew York and Harlem ¡Railroad Company for damages to said property by reason of the elevation of the tracks in front of said property or the running of engines or trains thereon, or connected in any way therewith, accrued to the date of the instrument, should not pass by said conveyance to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Muhlker v. New York & Harlem RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. McKenna v. Brooklyn Union Elevated RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. Freund v. BielAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Anderson v. New York & Harlem RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API