Spence v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1DissentMurphy, C. J.
The Court today fashions a per se rule which requires a new trial whenever the trial judge announces a verdict before the defendant has either made or waived closing argument. In so doing, the majority creates a flat and absolute rule of constitutional dimension which is not recognized in any other jurisdiction. I, therefore, respectfully dissent.
The trial in this case was before the court, sitting without a jury. At the conclusion of the State’s case, Spence moved for a judgment of acquittal and argued in favor of the motion at some length. After the motion was denied, the defense presented…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Herring v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Ruedas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Yopps v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- Louis West v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- State v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.