Legal Opinion
Quick v. City of Austin
Texas Supreme Court
Decided September 30, 1999No. 96-1154Published
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Abbott
in which Chief Justice PHILLIPS, Justice HECHT, Justice OWEN, and Justice GONZALES join.
We.granted Petitioners’ Motion for Rehearing. We now withdraw Part VI of our opinion and substitute the following.
VI
Petitioners finally contend that the court of appeals erred by holding that only projects in which the original permit applications were filed after September 1, 1987 are required to be considered on the basis of the City’s regulations and ordinances in effect at the time the original permit applications were filed. Chele C made applications for preliminary subdivision approval for five…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Cox v. HartSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Regions Hospital v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Knight v. International Harvester Credit Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.