Roman v. Roman's Minors
Supreme Court of Louisiana
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF THE SECOND DISTRICT. This was an action brought against the tutor of minors claiming from them a debt due by the estate of the ancestor. The defendants excepted to the jurisdiction of the court, which exception was sustained, and the cause transferred to the Court of Probates. From this judgement the plaintiffs appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtMathews, J.
This suit is brought against the tutor of minors to recover from the succession of their mother a certain sum of money, which the plaintiff alleges to be owing and due to her from said succession, and which the defendants are bound to pay in consequence of having accepted it.
The tutor excepted to the jurisdiction of the District Court. His exceptions was sustained, and the judge a quo ordered the cause to be sent for trial to the Court of Probates of the Parish of St. James. From this judgement the plaintiff appealed.
We are of opinion that the court below did not err in declining jurisdiction…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Picou v. DussuauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1843
- Babin v. DoddSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1843
- Self v. MorrisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1844
- Watts v. FrazerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1833
- Arthur v. CochranSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1845
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.