Legal Opinion

Burnett v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1954No. 29,178PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

Appellant was charged by affidavit with grand larceny under Acts 1941, ch. 148, §9, p. 447, being §10-3001, Burns’ 1942 Replacement, tried by jury, and found guilty of petit larceny.

The only error assigned is the overruling of appellant’s motion for a new trial. The questions presented pertain to certain proceedings of the court by which the defendant-appellant was allegedly prevented from having a fair trial. 1

The act or acts which are alleged to be irregular or erroneous are:

The action of the jury in returning three verdicts as follows:(1) “We, the jury, find the defendant guilty of petit…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. HattaboughIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Limeberry v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Skelton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Moore v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Payne v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Gambill v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Griffin v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Carter v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Grimes v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API