Burnett v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
Appellant was charged by affidavit with grand larceny under Acts 1941, ch. 148, §9, p. 447, being §10-3001, Burns’ 1942 Replacement, tried by jury, and found guilty of petit larceny.
The only error assigned is the overruling of appellant’s motion for a new trial. The questions presented pertain to certain proceedings of the court by which the defendant-appellant was allegedly prevented from having a fair trial. 1
The act or acts which are alleged to be irregular or erroneous are:
The action of the jury in returning three verdicts as follows:(1) “We, the jury, find the defendant guilty of petit…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. HattaboughIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Limeberry v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1945
- Skelton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Moore v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1947
- Payne v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1977
- Gambill v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
- Griffin v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
- Carter v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
- Grimes v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.