Legal Opinion

Seidel v. Gaynor

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1960Published

1Opinion of the CourtHerbert D. Hamm, J.

The petition alleges as a separate and

third cause of action:

1 ‘ twenty-fourth : That the communication dated the 17 day of December 1959, ‘ Exhibit B ’ annexed hereto, notifying the petitioner that he is to be discharged and removed effective the 30 day of December, 1959, is signed by William F. Meyers as Administrative officer.

1 ‘ twenty-fifth : That William F. Meyers has no authority to discharge or remove the petitioner and that such authority is reposed in the Commissioner of the State Division of Housing exclusively.

*141‘ ‘ twenty-sixth : That as a result of the allegations contained in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Goldschmidt v. . Bd. of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Conway v. CareyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  3. Morrison v. MosesNew York Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Morrison v. MosesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API