Nelson v. Michigan Tanning & Extract Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Delta; Flannigan, J. Case by Otto Nelson against the Michigan Tanning & Extract Company for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.
The plaintiff was employed as a brakeman on a switch engine of the defendant used in moving to desired places at the factory of the defendant cars of hemlock bark and also bark known as “hog feed.” There is testimony tending to prove that he was riding and standing upon the front end of a gondola car that was being moved at about 4 miles an hour, and when about 500 feet from a switch he signaled the engineer to slow down. The engineer slowed down to about 2 or 3 miles an hour. The plaintiff jumped off about 150 feet from the switch, on the right-hand (engineer’s) side of the track, and ran…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hewitt v. East Jordan Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Jackson Bridge & Iron Co. v. Lancashire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Gold v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Canerdy v. Port Huron, St. Clair & Marine City Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
- De Cair v. Manistee & Grand Rapids RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sandstrom v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917