Woods v. State

MORROW, Judge.

The appellant was prosecuted as a delinquent child, upon averments charging in substance that he had burglarized the building of one Mowrey. To sustain the conviction reliance is had upon circumstantial evidence alone. It was shown by Mowrey that his store was entered, and that he missed a box of cigars that had not been opened and several cans of Prince Albert tobacco; and “some cigars and some cans of Prince Albert tobacco ’’ were produced at the trial and identified by Mowrey as of the same kind as those lost. He also identified what is described as a red pepper or spice can,…