Legal Opinion

Arrington v. Cary

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1875PublishedCited by 5 opinions

FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from the Circuit Court. Nathaniel Baxter, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Lea, Sp. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Arrington & Farrar, being real estate • agents or .brokers in the city of Nashville, were employed by Eugene Cary to sell, or aid him in selling, a house and lot in Edgefield, on Russell street, belonging to him. They received from him a description of the property, entered the same in their books, and made publication in the advertising columns in the newspapers and displayed the same on their bulletin board. He directed them to sell for $13,000, one-third cash, the remainder in one and two years with interest. M. M. Brien, Jr., being desirous…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Parks v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  2. Robinson v. Kemmons Wilson Realty CompanyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1956
  3. Bell v. StrauchCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1954
  4. Newman v. HillCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1945
  5. Provident Trust Co. v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API