Diaz v. Lopresti
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The Supreme Court correctly determined that the defendant established, prima facie, his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law dismissing the first, second, and sixth causes of action asserted by the plaintiff Ashley Diaz (hereinafter Ashley), and the third cause of action asserted by the plaintiff Debbie Diaz for loss of Ashley’s services by showing that Ashley did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident (see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345 [2002]; Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). However, in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Sainte-Aime v. HoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Roman v. Fast Lane Car Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Cornelius v. Cintas Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Lively v. FernandezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Wilson v. ColosimoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Niles v. Lam Pakie HoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Rivera v. Bushwick Ridgewood Properties, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Ciancio v. NolanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.