Legal Opinion

Strecker v. Conn

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1883No. 9,070PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Pulaski Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

— It -is only where a defect of parties appears on the face of the complaint that a demurrer for that cause will lie j in other cases the question must be presented by answer.

*470Answers returned by a jury to interrogatories addressed to them are to be taken together, and not separately.

Judgment will always be pronounced upon the general verdict, unless the findings in the answers to the interrogatories are utterly irreconcilable with the general verdict.

In the present case, the general verdict was for the appellee, and the question first presented in argument is, whether the answers to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ketcham v. ClarkNew York Supreme Court · 1810
  2. Uhl v. HarveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. City Bank of Brooklyn v. . McChesneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  4. Lovejoy v. SpaffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. Southwick & Wheelock v. McGovernSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Shuck v. State ex rel. CopeIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. In re Stoddard Bros. Lumber Co.District Court, D. Idaho · 1909
  3. Wilkerson v. WoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924
  4. Irvine v. Baxter Stove Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1919
  5. Arrow Petroleum Co. v. AMESIndiana Court of Appeals · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API