Floyd v. PAROLE AND PROBATION COM'N
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
509 So.2d 919 (1987)
Ronald J. FLOYD, Petitioner,
v.
PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION, et al., Respondents.
No. 68878.
Supreme Court of Florida.
June 25, 1987.
Michael E. Allen, Public Defender, Second Judicial Circuit, Tallahassee, for petitioner.
Kurt E. Ahrendt, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Florida Parole and Probation Com'n, Tallahassee, for respondents.
GRIMES, Justice.
On petition for writ of habeas corpus, we consider the question of whether counsel should be furnished to indigent defendants in all parole revocation proceedings. We have jurisdiction under article V, section 3(b)(9), Florida Constitution.
Pe…
Also in this document: Dissent · Barkett; Dissent · Barkett; Dissent · Kogan.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. HeathSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
- State v. DoddSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
- Hicks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. MeeksSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- Peters v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
- State v. ScarletSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- Scarlet v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Thompson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.