Legal Opinion

Scott v. Hale

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 15, 1839PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The substance of the - declaration, and the whole of the bill of exceptions relative to the admission of the testimony objected to, and for the admission of which alone the new trial was granted, are found in the opinion of the Court.

Read the full summary

The substance of the - declaration, and the whole of the bill of exceptions relative to the admission of the testimony objected to, and for the admission of which alone the new trial was granted, are found in the opinion of the Court. Other questions were raised at the trial before Si-iepley J., stated in the exceptions, and argued, but need not be given here, as the decision was not founded upon the consideration of them. contended that the testimony objected to was inadmissible. It was evidence of the general character of the defendant as to his carefulness in regard to fires, which should…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was drawn up by

Emery J.

The plaintiff in a declaration containing two counts, in one represents himself as seized, and possessed of a certain tract of land in Foxcroft, on which was a dwellinghouse and a store, on the 1st of Oct. 1832, which dwellinghouse he then at the defendant’s request, suffered and permitted him to occupy as tenant at will, that on the 1st of June, 1833, Hah of his own motion, and for his own convenience, erected on the plaintiff’s land, a building additional to and adjoining to the plaintiff’s said dwellinghouse, and in the building so erected by…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Adams v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API