Legal Opinion
Winestine v. Ziglatzki-Marks Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 16, 1904PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Action of ejectment, brought to the District Court of Waterbury and reserved on a finding of facts (Cowell, A) for advice.
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
The plaintiffs’ title is by a deed to Mrs. Winestine from Enoch L. and Jane L. Tinkham, husband and wife, executed, delivered and recorded on June 22d, 1908. Mrs. Winestine bargained for the land, upon which was a large store building, and paid for it partly in cash from her own funds, and partly by her notes in favor of Mrs. Tinkham, secured by a mortgage to the latter executed by Mrs. Winestine in which her husband was not named and did not join.
The defendant claimed a right of possession under a lease for five years from November 1st, 1902, signed by it and Mrs. Tinkham on or before J une…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Austin v. . AhearneNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- King v. Housatonic RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1877
- Sill v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1892
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hartford Realization Co. v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. RussellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
- Peck & Hills Furniture Co. of Texas v. LongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Hawley Corp. v. West Virginia Broadcasting Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1938
- State, Ex Rel. Hoffman v. PowellSupreme Court of Florida · 1935