Legal Opinion
United States v. Jose Hanono-Surujun
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided September 12, 1990No. 90-1187PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOWNES, Senior Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a sentence based on an upward departure from the applica ble sentencing guideline. Defendant-appellant Jose Hanono-Surujun presents four issues on appeal. Because we find that appellant must be resentenced because of the district court’s failure to comply with Fed. Rule 32(c)(3)(D), we do not consider the other issues. 1
THE PLEA
Defendant and forty co-defendants were charged in a forty-count indictment with violations of federal narcotics, firearms and racketeering laws. Defendant was named in three counts: one, thirty-seven and thirty-eight.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gomez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Dominic L. Serino, United States of America v. John L. CloseCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Andrew EschweilerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- United States v. James J. LyonsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Harold T. BradleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- United States v. Paul J. SavoieCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Lorenzo OsorioCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Perry A. Graham, United States of America v. Terrence A. Terrell, United States of America v. Roger v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- United States v. TavanoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Terryl Geer, A/K/A Terry GeerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.