Legal Opinion

Eva Rose Boling v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 23, 1956No. 14727_1PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

An appeal has been brought by a plaintiff in an action for damages for alleged personal injury from the order of the District Court terminating the proceeding for lack of prosecution. The action was against the government under the provisions of the Tort Claims Act, 28 U. S.C.A. § 2671 et seq.

The power of the trial court to dismiss a cause where the matter has become stale by virtue of inaction by plaintiff is inherent and has been crystallized by rule. Rule 41(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. One of the causes of congestion of the trial dockets is the failure of courts to…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. A. M. Pearson v. Denny DennisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  2. Smith v. LujanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  3. Souchet v. CosíoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961
  4. Dessar v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  5. William R. Russell v. William CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API