Legal Opinion

Monroe v. State ex rel. Willard

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1901No. 19,303PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Erom Delaware Circuit Court; Albert O. Marsh, Judge. Mandamus by. the State on the relation of William E. Willard against Eobert W. Monroe, as county auditor, to compel the issuance of a county warrant. Erom a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtDowling, J.

The relator of the appellee served as a juror on the trial of a criminal cause in the Delaware Circuit Court from November 20, 1899, to December 2, 1899, both inclusive, making thirteen calendar days. He resided at the county seat and was entitled to no mileage. The court allowed the juror $50 for such service. This allowance . was entered on the records of the court, and was duly certified to the county auditor. The relator demanded a warrant on the treasurer for the payment of the sum certified to be due. The auditor refused to comply with this demand, «although there was money in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. SummerfieldIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  2. State ex rel. Board of Commissioners v. JamisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. State ex rel. Brookshire v. SnodgrassIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. State ex rel. Behymer v. PerryIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Board of Commissioners v. Board of CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Comms. Natrona v. Comms. FremontWyoming Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API