Legal Opinion

Meeks v. AutoZone, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 21, 2018No. E061775Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 6/21/18 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO NATASHA MEEKS, Plaintiff and Appellant, E061775 v. (Super.Ct.No. RIC10019124) AUTOZONE, INC. et al., OPINION Defendants and Appellants. APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Edward D. Webster (retired Judge of the Riverside Super. Ct. assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to art. IV, § 6 of the Cal. Const.) and Raquel A. Marquez, Judges. Affirmed in part, reversed in part with directions. Rastegar & Matern, Matthew J. Matern and Sandra M. Falchetti…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Sprint/United Management Co. v. MendelsohnSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Yanowitz v. L'OREAL USA, INC.California Supreme Court · 2005
  4. People v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  5. People v. AlvarezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API