Legal Opinion

Vestavia Country Club v. Armstrong

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 14, 1960No. 6 Div. 472Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing

SIMPSON, Justice.

The rehearing brief of appellant questions the soundness of the statement in the original opinion that the “judgment by default with leave to prove damages” was interlocutory.

As we read the cases, this is a correct statement of the law. It is inconceivable that there could be two final judgments in a single action at law. “It is not the practice of courts of law to dispose of causes piecemeal by rendering separate final judgments, at different times.” Ex parte Mason, 213 Ala. 279, 104 So. 523, 524.

As we said in Ex parte Overton, 174 Ala. 256, 258, 57 So. 434:

“But…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bozeman v. DillardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  2. Ex Parte MasonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  3. Ex parte OvertonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  4. Blankenship v. HailSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  5. Ex Parte RicherzhagenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API